|
|
|
|
| GERMANY Prof.
Dr. Edith Neubauer, Berlin |
Odette Farrells artistic work stands almost exclusively
in the spell of the female body. Their tender, flexible
woman forms make the viewer thoughtful. The interaction
of movement, _expression and colour aims perfectly
at the intensive request of the artist to lend to
its represented women an isolatingness from the
material environment to those resulted from their
thought losingness, to their deep thoughtfulness.
All of them are hurtable, full unsolvable questions,
they are never solved and lucky, they are rather
lonely and sadly. Refering to "Bowing woman"(Mixed
media on paper 2004) here the whole force of this
very individual feeling world reveals itself. Man
and woman are united rarely in the picture (Blues
on red couch 2005). Even then a rather appearing
strange is noticeable instead of human warmth and
affection. Also "Adamo 62" (técnica mixta
en papel 2000) is no more self-confidently and strength-shows,
but a palpation, an asking. The influence of the
Austrian expressionist Egon Schiele is unmistakable.
To him Odette Farrell is close, not only stylistic,
but also internally. Her language inside the picture
is unmistakably her one's own. Odette is a searcher,
an asker –touching in her direct truthfulness, delivering
a drilling question to senses. Finished answers
has she not, and these makes her work in such a
way so energizing, so alive and so love-worth.
|
|
|
| MEXICO Tere
Cabrera, Casa Lamm, Mexico City |
DE LO URBANO Y DE LO FEMENINO Exhibition,
April 2006. (letter)
Odette, regarding the exhibition I must tell you
that it did impact me. Besides the great drawing level
I found (which tells me a lot regarding an artist),
I love the treatment you give to feminine body, which
spreads sensuality. I have taken some time in order
to think that you are one of the few women artists
that speak about feminine sensuality. Along Art History
this topic was mastered by men. Some women artists
(like Berthe Morrisot for example) took it but they
talk about feminine tenderness, but it is not common
to find that a woman artist give shape to femenine
erotism.. I am thinking that in literature and photography
this topic has been more picked up by women, but very
few did it in painting. I do think you have an important
vein to explore in. You must throw yourslef, project
to the most renowned spaces because you have -and
I don't want to use the beaten words "talent"
or "potential" - well, I just want to tell
you that your work have such a stenght that it does
transmit.
|
|
| |
ITALY Roberto Malfatti, Art
Critic, Livorno |
|
SHORT ESSAY ON THE PAINTING OF ODETTE FARRELL
The bodies and the faces that Odette Farrell paints are
dipped (or suspended) in a kind of atmosphere where references
lack completely, and therefore certainties from space and
time. They are not-places, so in order to get oriented it
is useless as well as impossible to use co-ordinates. The
dimension in which the Farrell moves is similar to that
previous one to the Big-Bang, in which time and space already
existed, but they were latent, and yet unexpressed.
The represented shapes are dissolved shapes, lacking in
contours and they assert themselves as entity in grace of
their own existence and not of their being represented.
The minimal perspective search is completely absent because
the same premises for its possibility lack to exist.
The pictures of Farrell therefore do not testify a certain
search of order in the chaos of the existence; they rather
testify to inquire in the very origin of the existence.
It is not a search of theological type and, although the
way to proceed is not speculative, it is even distant from
the dreamlike contemplation, as the total absence of symbolism
shows.
The renunciation from Farrell to space-time connotations
is not only a pure aesthetic choice, at least not at the
minor meant of this term, but it is the consequence of her
actual world vision and from the distance taken away from
the comfortable relativism of our time, that pulling down
some barriers and abolishing some limits, has raised many
others which are as well not less easy to cross.
The certainties spread by the markets expansion and the
conviction that everyone would have enjoyed the riches produced
from it has also shown the precariousness and the unbearable
of this race. The harmony between folks has not replaced
discord and abolished conflicts; at the same time the individual
is not more in peace with himself: it is restless and uncertain.
In this world that tries to be persuasive and optimistic,
death, pain and loneliness are as active as never before.
That this happens while we have acquaintance of knowledge
and riches that were never enjoyed by humanity, can only
throw shadows on the same nature of human being.
Here therefore Farrell decides to go out from the course
of events, she puts herself to the margins and grabs the
only raft of salvation that appears to her reliable: art.
This action does not represent a romantic stamp escape,
on the contrary it is a total immersion in the magma that
in this precise historical moment is boiling under the crust
and it is coming out in part.
One of the more recognizable colors and mainly used by Farrell
is the one of eroticism, a pure not polluted one.
It is in eroticism where Farrell sees the force (between
those of material nature) that is able not only to assure
the continuity of life, but also its fullness.
The faces that the artist often paints carry a lot the signs
of pain and anguish and very rarely they seem to find quiet;
in the same way the bodies often appear contracted. This
demonstrates that it is not enough to cut oneself off in
one dimension outside from time in order to find peace:
our pains, our fears, our nightmares will follow us even
there.
What is necessary to do is to go back in that prime dimension
and this recovery operation demands immense hard work and
the constant control of the one just operated.
The logical, rational and technological man of our time
has understood the limits of his own logic, of his own rationality
and of his own ability to dominate the world. He must melt
down again his own relationship with life: this is what
Odette Farrell tries to say with her colors.
I suggest the reading of the essay by Achille Bonito
Oliva dedicated to Egon Schiele, perhaps the artist who
more than every other has inspired Odette Farrell.
|
| |

|
|